{"id":2088,"date":"2021-02-05T10:04:19","date_gmt":"2021-02-05T10:04:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2024\/02\/27\/the-supreme-court-of-lithuania-upheld-the-complaint-of-a-non-professional-investor-represented-by-confidence-law-office-in-the-case-against-the-bank\/"},"modified":"2024-02-27T11:22:21","modified_gmt":"2024-02-27T11:22:21","slug":"the-supreme-court-of-lithuania-upheld-the-complaint-of-a-non-professional-investor-represented-by-confidence-law-office-in-the-case-against-the-bank","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/2021\/02\/05\/the-supreme-court-of-lithuania-upheld-the-complaint-of-a-non-professional-investor-represented-by-confidence-law-office-in-the-case-against-the-bank\/","title":{"rendered":"THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"2088\" class=\"elementor elementor-2088 elementor-1793\" data-elementor-post-type=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-799bd5c elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"799bd5c\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-a3ac544\" data-id=\"a3ac544\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-db5a2a0 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"db5a2a0\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman, serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">The client, while making an investment decision, suffered damage due to the bank&#8217;s failure to fulfill its obligations. The lower courts dismissed the bank&#8217;s violations, asserting that investing involves inherent risks, and an unprofitable outcome does not warrant compensation. The Lithuanian Appellate Court (LAT) found these conclusions unfounded, emphasizing that the case&#8217;s circumstances were not fully explored. LAT ruled that the bank, held to higher standards of professional activity, must properly inform non-professional investors about risks. It concluded that the bank failed to prove full disclosure of information on investment suitability, and the lower courts unjustifiably placed this burden on the non-professional investor.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The client, while making an investment decision, suffered damage due to the bank&#8217;s failure to fulfill its obligations. The lower courts dismissed the bank&#8217;s violations, asserting that investing involves inherent risks, and an unprofitable outcome does not warrant compensation. The Lithuanian Appellate Court (LAT) found these conclusions unfounded, emphasizing that the case&#8217;s circumstances were not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1796,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ocean_post_layout":"","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"0","ocean_second_sidebar":"0","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"0","ocean_custom_header_template":"0","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"0","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"0","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"default","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"0","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"on","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2088","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry","has-media"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK - Confidence Law Office<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK - Confidence Law Office\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The client, while making an investment decision, suffered damage due to the bank&#8217;s failure to fulfill its obligations. The lower courts dismissed the bank&#8217;s violations, asserting that investing involves inherent risks, and an unprofitable outcome does not warrant compensation. The Lithuanian Appellate Court (LAT) found these conclusions unfounded, emphasizing that the case&#8217;s circumstances were not [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Confidence Law Office\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-02-05T10:04:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-27T11:22:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/146443836_445544753537581_8747207448193588698_n.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"843\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"843\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"confidence.law\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"confidence.law\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"confidence.law\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#\/schema\/person\/0a5203f366036d4912864a76f3f06173\"},\"headline\":\"THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-05T10:04:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-27T11:22:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/\"},\"wordCount\":126,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/146443836_445544753537581_8747207448193588698_n.jpg\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/\",\"name\":\"THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK - Confidence Law Office\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/146443836_445544753537581_8747207448193588698_n.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-05T10:04:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-27T11:22:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/146443836_445544753537581_8747207448193588698_n.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/146443836_445544753537581_8747207448193588698_n.jpg\",\"width\":843,\"height\":843},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/\",\"name\":\"Confidence Law Office\",\"description\":\"Rise with confidence\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Confidence Law Office\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Logo.jpg\",\"width\":2245,\"height\":812,\"caption\":\"Confidence Law Office\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#\/schema\/person\/0a5203f366036d4912864a76f3f06173\",\"name\":\"confidence.law\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/d54b3e3c1ceca61979075111dcacb5a8.jpg?ver=1776124788\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/d54b3e3c1ceca61979075111dcacb5a8.jpg?ver=1776124788\",\"caption\":\"confidence.law\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/confidence.law\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/author\/confidence-law\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK - Confidence Law Office","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK - Confidence Law Office","og_description":"The client, while making an investment decision, suffered damage due to the bank&#8217;s failure to fulfill its obligations. The lower courts dismissed the bank&#8217;s violations, asserting that investing involves inherent risks, and an unprofitable outcome does not warrant compensation. The Lithuanian Appellate Court (LAT) found these conclusions unfounded, emphasizing that the case&#8217;s circumstances were not [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/","og_site_name":"Confidence Law Office","article_published_time":"2021-02-05T10:04:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-27T11:22:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":843,"height":843,"url":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/146443836_445544753537581_8747207448193588698_n.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"confidence.law","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"confidence.law","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/"},"author":{"name":"confidence.law","@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#\/schema\/person\/0a5203f366036d4912864a76f3f06173"},"headline":"THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK","datePublished":"2021-02-05T10:04:19+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-27T11:22:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/"},"wordCount":126,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/146443836_445544753537581_8747207448193588698_n.jpg","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/","url":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/","name":"THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK - Confidence Law Office","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/146443836_445544753537581_8747207448193588698_n.jpg","datePublished":"2021-02-05T10:04:19+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-27T11:22:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/146443836_445544753537581_8747207448193588698_n.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/146443836_445544753537581_8747207448193588698_n.jpg","width":843,"height":843},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/2021\/02\/05\/lietuvos-auksciausiasis-teismas-lat-tenkino-confidence-atstovaujamo-neprofesionalaus-investuotojo-skunda-byloje-pries-banka\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"THE SUPREME COURT OF LITHUANIA UPHELD THE COMPLAINT OF A NON-PROFESSIONAL INVESTOR REPRESENTED BY CONFIDENCE LAW OFFICE IN THE CASE AGAINST THE BANK"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/","name":"Confidence Law Office","description":"Rise with confidence","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#organization","name":"Confidence Law Office","url":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Logo.jpg","width":2245,"height":812,"caption":"Confidence Law Office"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#\/schema\/person\/0a5203f366036d4912864a76f3f06173","name":"confidence.law","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/d54b3e3c1ceca61979075111dcacb5a8.jpg?ver=1776124788","contentUrl":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/d54b3e3c1ceca61979075111dcacb5a8.jpg?ver=1776124788","caption":"confidence.law"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/confidence.law"],"url":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/author\/confidence-law\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2088","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2088"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2088\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2091,"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2088\/revisions\/2091"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1796"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2088"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2088"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/confidence.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2088"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}